News Alert
Monmouth County Man Sentenced To 40 Years For…

Red Light Camera Reform Bill Introduced

Local legislator Declan O'Scanlon, R-13, introduced a bipartisan bill to reform red light cameras.

With Red Light Cameras throughout the state having been turned back on following a recent suspension, and with other towns considering setting up cameras of their own at busy intersections, a bipartisan bill has been introduced in the state assembly to alleviate some of the criticisms associated with the controversial program.

Local legislator Assemblyman Declan O’Scanlon, R-13, a noted opponent of the Red Light Camera program, is a lead sponsor of the reform bill, which was introduced Wednesday.

According to a released statement, the proposed legislation increases yellow light timing at intersections with cameras by a full second. It also would reduce the fine of right turns on red from $85 to $20 and finally would mandate a half-second grace period once the light turns red to allow cars to move through the intersection.

The changes are necessary, O’Scanlon argues, because of existing flaws in a program he believes doesn’t increase safety anyway, but is instead used only as a way for towns to generate revenue.

In June, Gov. Chris Christie ordered a majority of the state’s red light cameras suspended after concerns were raised over inaccurate timing. Though the cameras were eventually turned back on, O’Scanlon claims an engineer he hired personally to assess yellow light timing following the restart still found flaws in the system.

“If these cameras are going to be used by our towns they must operate in accordance with the intent of the law and the programming parameters must be clearly laid out in that law,” O’Scanlon said in a statement. “This new legislation solves all of the flaws of the current pilot program, eliminates confusion and ensures our constituents are being treated fairly. I would be perfectly happy to end this failed program immediately, failing that, we must enact this legislation.”

The bill already has bipartisan support from legislators in Monmouth, Bergen, Hunterdon and Somerset Counties.

Though the Red Light Camera Program has been beset with complaints and criticisms, some towns have attempted to get into the program. In some cases, the case for cameras comes down to having heavily trafficked intersections and a limited police force.

SgtJayP September 20, 2012 at 10:05 AM
These are income generators for a state that already is raping us with taxes. They do nothing for safety! Stop the madness with these cameras!!!
KirkT September 20, 2012 at 09:17 PM
So sick of this state, its taxes and these losers trying to tell me what is good for me!
JosephGhabourLaw September 21, 2012 at 06:32 PM
The issue here is creating a safer driving environment, not raising municipal revenue. While the longer yellow phase is great, there needs to be clear access to information stating when the light was last synchronized. Cameras need to be for safety, which is Shrewsbury’s claim. With the bill the cameras do just that, without hitting taxpayers with dangerous and unfair automated systems. Studies have show that longer yellows are safer, which is common sense. Drivers will slam on the breaks at a yellow light, creating the potential for an accident, in fear of a ticket. The right-turn violation is rational as well, as the purpose of the cameras should be,again, safety and not ticket revenue.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »