Fort's Redevelopers To Send Their Formal Disapproval to Department of Defense Over Commissary Closure

"Put the human element on it," says Freeholder Lillian Burry.

When word got out last week that the Department of Defense (DOD) would, in fact, be closing the commissary at Fort Monmouth, Patch gave its top spot to the slighted law makers who had pushed to save it. But Freeholder Lillian Burry says its the "marginal people" who should be front page news.

Not marginal in spirit or worth, Burry would say, "but whose lifestyle is quite marginal." Burry said she received a number of calls from people upset over the DOD's decision but the one that stood out the most to her was a widow, who is largely dependent upon the commissary and the 30 percent discount it provides on food and household goods to members of the military and their families.

Burry said her conversation with the widow, "Put the human element on it, which I am afraid was not done by the DOD."

At her meeting this week with the Veterans Affairs Committee, a subcommitte of the Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority (FMERA), she said the members spent a long time discussing their disappointment with the decision.

"It goes beyond disappointment," she said.

In its statement to Patch last week, the DOD said, "In this constrained budgetary environment the department must take advantage of all previously approved and programmed savings, so we can realign resources to better support force structure changes ... Authorized patrons can still enjoy the commissary benefit by using the commissaries at Lakehurst NAES (30 miles), Joint Base Lakehurst-McGuire-Dix (46 miles) and Fort Hamilton (45 miles)."

"The idea," Burry told the FMERA board Wednesday, "that [the widow] could get to Fort Dix is out of the question."

The freeholder said she and the other committee members are looking into the possibility of providing transportation, possibly once a week, to other commissaries for people like this widow who can't get there on their own.

FMERA's executive Director Bruce Steadman had made his disapproval of the DOD's decision public last week in Patch's story and reiterated FMERA's position again Wednesday. Eatontown Mayor Gerald Tarantolo made a motion at the FMERA meeting that the authority pass a resolution and send it to the DOD making its disapproval official.

"The Department of Defense is very insensitive on this decision that they made," he said.

The board agreed unanimously to send the resolution.

Retired Army man and Oceanport resident Michael McMahon applauded FMERA's move and urged the board to send the resolution out immediately.

"I don't think that any of those people who made that decision drive a 100 miles to the grocery store," McMahon said.

Carol August 18, 2011 at 05:17 PM
By the time you pay for gas & tolls to get to the other commissaries it will cost you more than if you shopped at a local store. So exactly what is it that they are doing for the retirees & their families? NOTHING !!
Thomas A. Blasi August 19, 2011 at 12:36 AM
The savings of 30% is an average figure; most of the savings are on meat & meat products. Remove these items and that 30% diminishes quite a bit. A careful shopper can do just as well in the area supermarkets by using coupons and looking for sales just like the rest of us must do. Furthermore, grocery giants like COSTCO and BJs can provide even better savings. In a worst case scenario, DOD might consider vouchers issued to those authorized to use them. With vouchers the individual would be able to shop in any area grocery store or supermarket and be afforded the same prices they were paying in the commissary


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »