patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Barnacle Bill's Tradition: Is it 'Peanuts'?

The longtime tradition at the Rumson bar and grill of peanuts and good company has come to an end over lawsuits and allergies. Has society become overly litigious and hyper-cautious?

 

For decades, the comforting crunch of peanut shells underfoot, a table with a riverfront view and a standing appetizer of mindless shelling, munching and good company is what many people in the Rumson-Fair Haven area have counted on from Barnacle Bill’s.

Going through those auto-pilot motions of walking in to a place where old friends meet, scooping up those peanuts, cracking and catching up is something that has been known to soothe the local soul like hot chicken soup on a cold day.

Granted, some people don’t even like chicken soup, but if it’s what’s been passed on to them as a staple comfort, it’s what brings them back to that good, warm feeling inside — like those peanuts at Barnacle Bill’s. It’s pretty simple. It’s a tradition. Call it a comfort tradition.

And that longstanding tradition of getting together at Barnacle’s over that nutty appetizer tradition just ended abruptly with a Facebook page message that made people go, well, a little nuts.

Judging by the near 500 comments that had ramped up the Barnacle Bill’s Facebook page by the end of Monday, ripping the one tradition away from many locals was akin to telling one of Jack the Ripper’s victims it was just a scratch.

Sunday, the following message from ownership on the Facebook page ended an era that truly wasn't just peanuts with the chagrin of a loved one’s funeral:

“To all our loyal customers: Due to increased reports of peanut allergies as well as a number of slip-and-fall claims we have decided to remove the peanuts from the bar and dining room. We are committed to maintaining the casual, family-friendly atmosphere that you all enjoy! We appreciate your understanding and look forward to seeing you all soon for some great food and music on the Navesink!! Cheers!”

The comments that followed ranged from supportive, to amusingly upset to vehement and beyond. There were a few comments peppering the post that chided others for being insensitive to those with peanut allergies. 

And then there were those who out-and-out flogged the venue's ownership for bowing to the pressure of what they deemed overly litigious people and overboard with allergy sensitivity claims.

Most all comments, though, denounced the peanut pouncing with conviction, be it gentle or strong.

There were the simple …

Rumson-Fair Haven Regional High School alumni Lana Sorrentino gave a simple “No, no, no … “ comment.

J. Paul Hughes, another R-FH alumni, simply said, “DISLIKE … Not OK. Is nothing sacred anymore?”

Then there were those who couldn’t resist the puns ...

“… Getting rid of the peanuts is the end of a tradition,” said Victor Malone. “The tradition just happens to be peanuts …”

“This is just nuts,” said Jack Hinge Pintzer.

Then there were the serious …

“How about people with seafood and shell fish allergies?” Mike Ciavolino wrote. “’Take the clams off the menu, these will make my kid sick!’ ‘My Doctor says I can only be around gluten free bread — change your buns ... or I'll sue!’ ‘My wife has Mad Cow disease!’ ‘We have a petition here requesting you serve veggie patties only, no more burgers.’ How long before Barnacle Bill's just serves "Air." Is air ok? Oh wait, dust allergies. Sorry we're no longer serving Air …”

“Another long, great tradition litigated from existence …” said Edward F. Thomas.

Some even wondered if there would be a burial ceremony for the antique peanut roaster from which the nuts were dispensed into “pick up your own” bottomless wooden bowls.

Visions of Fiddler on the Roof’s Tevye doing his “Tradition” dance around the roaster before it’s ceremoniously lowered to the bottom of the Navesink come to mind, too. I know, the notion is a little nuts.

But for anyone attached to the tradition Barnacle’s tradition, is it really that far off?

What do you think? The peanut tradition has been cracking at Barnacle Bill’s for more than 30 years. Has our society become too overly litigious — to the point of litigating too many traditions, like this one, away? Or do you think it’s really just about a few “nuts” and Barnacle Bill’s can do without the peanuts that have ended up turning a tradition sour for ownership?

*Editor's note: Sherman was unavailable for comment as of press time. Patch will continue the conversation with him in the near future.

For more news and updates about Rumson and Fair Haven, subscribe to our free newsletter, "like" us on Facebook or follow @RumsonPatch on Twitter. 

  • Do you think society has gone "nuts" over litigation and Barnacle Bill's being pressured by the threat is right or wrong?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes, Barnacle Bill's should bow to the threat of litigation. It's a different world.
        5 (6%)
    • No, Barnacle Bill's should stick to its traditon and not let an overly litigious society change a good thing.
        78 (93%)
    Total votes: 83
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Barnacle Bill's, Barnacle Bill's peanuts, Peanuts, and Rumson

Gary Parent

6:19 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Oh Boy! It was always a cute idea, but I don't go to Barnacle Bills because of the peanuts. I'm not going to miss them that much. I can't blame the owner(s) for making this decision to stop serving peanuts, as long as they keep serving good food.

Reply

Halley14

7:09 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Damn all of these wacky peanut allergy people and their kids. If you can't have peanuts go away!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lana Sorrentino

3:44 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

I agree with you Halley14...such a wonderful tradition has been taken away.

Anna Barfield

7:20 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

We enjoy barnacle bills, however our son has peanut allergies so we just get take out or go there without him. It is a shame bc i love tradition but when 1 in 5 children have a peanut allergy that they can die from i see the owners point.. Personally i slipped on them more than anything!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

njx

9:43 am on Monday, October 15, 2012

1 in 5 children have a peanut allergy? Nonsense. The truth is that eight percent of kids have some sort of food allergy. Maybe two percent of all kids are allergic to peanuts. That is based on a huge study which was published by the American Academy of Pediatrics this past summer.

Michael Sternbach

7:51 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Stupid. I guess 5 Guys will also have to drop their peanuts. If you have allergies avoid being close to the allergens.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ryan

9:55 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Nah- 5 Guys cooks in Peanut Oil. Their business is built around it. Not going to happen. To the poster above who said 1 in 5 children have the allergy now...ok- so 20 percent of children have the allergy. Why do we as a country always ponder to the lowest common denominator? If I'm allergic to cats, I don't make pet stores stop selling cats so that I can go in to buy dog food without being affected, right?

Comment_arrow

Who flung Poo

5:12 pm on Wednesday, October 10, 2012

It is actually closer the .02 %. It is typical of these ranting lunatics to want the rest of us to suffer. In NJ we spend 1.9 times as much for special kids as we do for normal kids! Why the discrimination?

Bunny Bixler

8:06 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Are there adults with peanut allergies?

Reply

Tracy Baker

8:18 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

My toddler son was diagnosed with a peanut allergy last year and it was a shock because we have no history of food allergies in our family. The number of cases are on the rise and the doctors do not understand why. With that said, I am not a whacky food allergy parent and my son is not a whacky food allergy kid. I am just a mom trying to keep her son safe. No parent ever wants to see their child get sick or worse possible die. While his diagnosis has altered our life, I don't expect any business or person to cater to our needs. There are plenty of safe places for us to eat. Or if they are not safe, my husband and I got without our son. Parents of kids with peanut allergies are not going to flock to Barnacle Bills to eat there now with decades of peanut residue still in the building. Since the number of cases are on the rise without explanation, people should not make such horrible and insensitive comments about kids with food allergies. It's not their fault and you never know when a loved one of yours may be effected.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jessica minetti

10:08 am on Monday, October 15, 2012

I couldn't agree with you more, Tracy Baker:)

Michael Megill

8:49 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

More than likely someone brought suit against BB's because of injury resulting from slipping on peanut shells. Couple that with the apparent surge in peanut allergies and the insurance company is raising premiums because of the increased exposure and claims experience. BB's needed to make a business decision to remove peanuts from it's premises in an effort to keep insurance premiums at a minimum and maintain positive cash flow. That's my guess.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DivineMomentsOfTruth

4:21 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Sharia Law coming to a town near you.. It's only "fair"...

And parents.. You need to find out why so many children are developing peanut allergies..Something is VERY wrong with that,, Don't you think? Could vaccines be the cause? Shouldn't finding out be your main concern?

Please eat somewhere else.. We ALL make "sacrifices" in our daily living!

Comment_arrow

njx

9:45 am on Monday, October 15, 2012

OMG, another lunatic anti-vaxxer decides to show up. And yes, anti-vaxxers are LUNATICS, no different than 9-11 truthers, moon hoaxers, etc.

Paul Hughes

9:07 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

I am not a lawyer and not an insurance agent. But I wish I was. Can someone sue me for this comment? Maybe I should get insurance that I dont get sued for this comment. I am a business owner and I understand that cost to insure against crazya** claims costs alot of cheddar burgers and beers. Wish i had some peanuts right now. Oh... thats right. No peanuts for me.

Reply

Susan

9:54 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Many years ago our son rubbed his eyes at BB and guess what, allergic reaction! We didn't tell the restaurant and don't blame them. We also don't go there often enough, the wait is always an hour or more! The restaurant is popular and can't imagine this will negatively impact their loyal customers.

Reply

Mitch Cumstein

10:19 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Maybe they will clean the floors now

Reply

rob p

11:24 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

My first job was at Barnacle Bills - I had to refill those peanuts (and clean the mussels) My sons and I will mis them terribly - don't give in Todd and Singh!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

BullDogs11

2:18 pm on Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Singh is long gone. Todd is the sole proprietor ( we'll leave Peter out of it..lol) Barnacles spends over 100k a year just in peanuts, the prices are through the roof..The peanuts have long been an issue. The Board of Health chastized them and closed them for a day after it was discovered that squirells were having a picnic every night after they closed. They were supposed to sweep the floor every hour or so, but that faded after a few weeks. Who goes there for peanuts..? they're there to keep you occupied while you wait..Simple solution would be to replace the peanuts with popcorn. Still salty, alot cheaper, and alot less hassles. It's not going to affect their business at all..It's the food, atmosphere, and STAFF that keeps people coming back, not the free peanuts...I support Todds decision, because it wasn't an easy one to make..

Comment_arrow

BullDogs12

10:24 pm on Wednesday, October 10, 2012

BullDogs11 sounds a lot like Patricia Quigley (Todd's wife) with all the inside information and defending her husband's decision.

Michael Sternbach

11:21 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Peanut allergies are frightening.....good idea to clean up the floor....now we can
go their with our niece who suffers the allergies of peanuts.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Erica Melone

11:11 am on Saturday, October 13, 2012

Michael... just double check. I don't know that anyone with peanut allergies should go with out consulting a doctor. There is 30 years of residual peanut dust and oil there. Could be dangerous.

Leslie

11:33 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

HAHAHA @ Mitch I almost choked on my coffee!

Reply

Lana Sorrentino

3:49 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Excellent article Elaine. Love the opening paragraph. I will requote Halley14 from above on Oct. 9th post: "Damn all of these wacky peanut allergy people and their kids. If you can't have peanuts go away!!!"" Perfectly said. Why should the other 80% lose this enjoyment because 20% of kids supposedly on average have allergies.

Reply

Len Dunikoski, GRI

4:24 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

I agree with Michael: this decision probably is due to threats of slip and fall litigation and has nothing to do with peanut allergies. I have a family member with a life-threatening peanut allergy. We know the risks and we don't go to restaurants that serve peanuts or use peanuts/peanut oil in their cooking. There's a great organization called the Food Allergy & Anaphylaxis Network http://www.foodallergy.org/ that has lots of educational materials and information on all types of food allergies; they say the latest incidence of peanut allergy is 2%.

Having said all this, I still LOVE Barnacle Bills, and I've gone there for many years with family members who don't have peanut allergies. I hope they reconsider- maybe they can install a slatted floor that will let the peanut shells fall through? Oh, I forgot: if they do, those with high heels might threaten to sue. Sigh.

Reply

wesdxcvvv

4:45 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Peanuts could have been kept and served by the staff in a conservative way, to keep us drinking the beer. Cutting it completely sounds like they want to cut expenses. I wonder what menu ingredients they are cutting?

Reply

Juanita Meilto

6:12 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

I blame the peanut kids and their parents. Some are logical thinkers but many are radicals who think the world revolves around them and their stupid peanut allergies.

I'm sick and tired of bending over backwards to accommodate 'special needs' of all sorts. The tail wagging the dog MUST END NOW!!!

Reply

ClarkB79

6:16 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

I'm with you Juanita! This madness must end.

Reply

Really?

8:40 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Yes, Juanita, lets blame the "peanut kids". What an intelligent thought!

Most likely, the liability insurance became too expensive to continue to offer the peanuts. The owners probably had a choice to make: continue to offer the peanuts and pass the additional insurance costs onto the customers or discontinue offering peanuts. Pretty simple, just a business decision. To blame kids who had the misfortune to be born with an allegery is misguided and small minded. If you're looking for blame, look no further than our out of control litigious society.

Reply

chun chun

11:51 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012

if u hate clowns dont go to the circus........

Reply

jessica minetti

12:09 pm on Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Loved the peanuts, but couldn't go once we found out one of my sons was allergic to them. So excited!

Reply

Anna Barfield

9:45 am on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Tracy baker .. You rock!! Well said.. I love that on here i am considered a wacko but all my friends and family consider me too relaxed to have child with a life threatening allergy... Ha! Like i said i hate seeing tradition go..

Reply

Mac

6:16 am on Saturday, October 13, 2012

What's next? Barring left-handed people from sitting at the bar?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Erica Melone

3:42 pm on Thursday, October 18, 2012

Wait.....they let lefties sit at the bar????

Jerry Harper

8:16 pm on Sunday, October 14, 2012

I remember the days when it was acceptable to actually cater to the desires of the a limited public and those who chose not to frequent those places could go somewhere else. I guess those days are gone but not forgotten.

Reply

George Clark

8:26 pm on Sunday, October 14, 2012

When are we going to over haul this legal robbery of suing for "peanuts"?

Reply

Mariclaire Scott

8:43 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

When my daughter was younger, she had a peanut allergy. We heard nothing but great things about Barnacle Bills. We would have loved to go, but didn't because of her allergy. I wouldn't take the chance that she would have a reaction. Today, she is grown out of the allergy. We now go to Barnacle Bills. If I chose to go to BB when she was allergic and she had a reaction, it would have been my fault... not theirs. It's a shame they took away the peanuts.

Reply

Leave a comment